/commentary

Dec 20, 2009, 7:00pm

The Decade’s 12 Greatest Developments in Payments: #8 The Mag Stripe Lives On

by David S. Evans

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Okay, so not dying doesn't sound like it could be one of the greatest developments of the decade. It is on my list because it some of the greatest developments in the last decade were the failure of massive efforts to displace the humble magstripe card. It is also on my list because it serves as a reminder that innovations in payments have to make people and merchants significantly better off to gain traction.

The magnetic stripe was developed in the 1950s by Frank Parry at IBM. He developed the technology for including security information in the stripe. He wanted to put it on the back of plastic cards but couldn’t figure out how to make it stick. As the story goes, when he mentioned his problem to his wife she said "Here, let me try the iron." That worked. The mag stripe card was first used in the 1960s by the London Transit and San Francisco Bart. I’ve had trouble pinning down the history of when it was first adopted for general purpose payment cards but it seems to have been in the 1970s. But in any event mag stripes widely used by the early 1980s when merchants moved en masse to installing electronic terminals at the point of sale. Billions of plastic cards with mag stripes on the back have been printed over the years and more than a billion mag stripe payment cards are in use in the United States along.

The mag stripe is primarily an authentication technology. Swiped at the point of sale it sets in motion the electronic process of sending signals up the line to the central switch where cards are authenticated and authorization decisions are made. People around the world have grown accustomed to swiping or sticking their cards so the mag stripe hits the heads of the readers that have been developed especially for this technology.

But, really now, magnetic stripes? It seems so quaint. In the age of the iPod and Tivo you are certain to mark your age by acknowledging that you listened to music on cassettes or used to watch movies on a VCR.

Those with a penchant for technology have seen far better alternatives for decades now. Many card systems toyed with smart cards in the 1980s — card that had computer chips in them. Most dropped the idea when it became apparent that smart cards were expensive and there wasn’t a business case for deploying them.

Smart cards came back in vogue this past decade in two forms designed to eventually kill off the mag stripe. In the United States the push was for contactless. Consumers were issued cards that coupled a mag stripe with contactless chip so that consumers would waive the card at merchants that had contactless readers. Although millions of people have these cards merchants that account for a significant amount of payment volume have resisted spending the extra money for contactless readers and consumers haven’t gotten in the habit of waiving. In Europe the push was for chip and pin. That was primarily for security reasons because many card transactions in Europe are still done offline (with limited fraud control) and fraud rates were high. The cards have a smart chip in them and cardholders type in a pin to authenticate themselves against information on the chip. About half of the Visa cards in Europe now have a chip. As with contactless cards these cards also have a mag stripe.

Why has the mag stripe technology proved so resilient? I think the answer is simple. It is really inexpensive to issue mag stripe cards and at least nowadays the point-of-sale technology for reading mag stripes has been perfected and benefits from economies of learning and scale. The process of swiping a card at the point of sale is extremely fast. In the United States fast computers in the distance make authentication and authorization hyper quick. To displace mag stripe it is necessary to come up with something truly better for all of the participants in the card transaction including consumers, merchants, acquirers, merchant processors, networks, and card processors.

This isn’t the place to debate how contactless and chip-pin will develop. Like many though, I believe the long run will involve the use of mobile devices to pay the point of sale instead of plastic cards. But I’m least agnostic on the authentication technology that will ultimately dominate on mobile devices.

If I had to make a prediction though it would be that at the end of the next decade most cards will still have a magnetic stripe on the back of them and most merchants will still have card readers that can accept these cards. We may well be far along a major transition to contactless mobile devices by then in the United States but I’m at least dubious that the process will be completed by then. Whose to know though? Maybe in 2019 I’ll have the replacement of the mag stripe card on my top 12 list.

Previous Great Developments in Payments During the Last Decade:

#9 Shanghai Surprise

#10 Collateral Damage from the Financial Crisis - Consolidation and Regulation

#11 How the World War on Interchange Fees Transformed the Card Industry

#12 American Express Goes Global

David S. Evans bio

Comments

Post your comment

Comments

  • David, I agree that migration away from magstripe has certainly been taking a long time, but I believe the tipping point was reached somewhere in the last 2 years...

    I would however not go as far to state chip migration has failed, but rather that Magstripe is like a weed (really well adapted to survive, but not welcome in my garden), and wont die easily...

    As for mobile being the future, probably, but as you said, who knows? I believe mobile will have no more of an easy time to displace magstripe or contact chip, as there are far less terminals accepting contactless than contact chips, and international interoperability will remain an issue.

    The payments industry suffers from a mega chicken and egg conundrum: without terminals accepting an specific type of instrument/token (cards/fobs/NFC devices), there is little incentive to issue to issue instruments/tokens of this type. Without scale none of these technologies will succeed. For EMV migration to reach this point in migration took a lot of lobbying, and funding by the payment systems to pay for terminals to upgrade, as well as interchange discounts, not to forget the liability shift. Without similar initiatives, I believe contactless and mobile mainstream adoption may even be slower...

    There is however one "weed killer" that has grown a lot from when EMV migration began, and that is fraud. Fraud is a serious problem for magnetic stripe and card not present transaction on the internet, both which are well addressed with smart payment instruments and 2/3 factor authentication (often including the smart instrument).

    Posted by Wynand Vermeulen, 22/12/2009 6:15am (2 years ago)

  • It certainly is amazing that the 1950s technology of the mag stripe is still being used.....It's no wonder that the crooks have caught up with this technology...PIN number requirements needs to be added for credit card transactions at the point of sale to deter fraud.....

    Posted by Bill Shaw, 21/12/2009 8:50am (2 years ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments

Follow PYMNTS.com