Get all the best news and insights in payments everyday in your inbox.
PART 1: • Handicapping PayPal in its Mobile Race with Google and Others
PART 2: • Handicapping Google in its Mobile Race with PayPal and Others
|
• Analysis: After Google Buys Motorola, What’s Next for the Payments Ecosystem? • PayPal President Reveals Plans to "Free You From the Cash Register" |
Over last two days, I handicapped PayPal and Google in their race with each other and potential players to grab a big share of the emerging mobile transaction platform ecosystem. Today, I’m going to share some final thoughts.
One thing that I think that the Starbucks mobile experience has shown us is how willing consumers are to adopt mobile payments solutions that only work in limited locations, like one store. The big question for all of the mobile payments solutions though is whether, how and for how long, consumers will tolerate a patchwork payments experience at the physical point of sale.
Yes, mobile phone penetration is to the point that just about everyone who wants a phone has one, which, of course, is an important step number one. But everyone also carries around their plastic cards now, too (and more so today than they do cash). What we don’t know yet is for how long the “belts and suspenders” approach to mobile payments (mobile wallets + cards just so you are covered) will be acceptable to consumers and what it will take for them to trade off lack of ubiquity for other goodies that will help drive mobile payments usage at the physical point of sale. We know that what drove Starbucks adoption (4 million users in less than three months) had nothing to do with making a payment transaction but rather solving for a problem that was more relevant to them and their customer: providing information on the available balance on their prepaid cards. Transacting was bolted to the ability of their customers to more easily manage prepaid card balances via the mobile phone.
It may come down to the fact that what drove adoption of plastic cards (speed and ubiquity) may not be as important, at least initially, in the mobile payments arena for either merchants or consumers (or the consumers standing behind the mobile payments user in-lane). It may be that mobile payments ignite first where they, in some sense, ignited last – local Main Street merchants that account for every day spend where consumers want a better way to interact with those merchants. It may also be that mobile payments ignite first in larger merchants where the notion of “store cards” becomes easier for consumers (since fat wallets in cyberspace is a non-issue) and more attractive for merchants who can see better economics from those propositions and offer different things to their customers. The future propositions for everyone pursuing the mobile payments vision seems to hinge on which of these forks in the road are pursued. And as always, the devil is in the details.
For sure, it’s still too early to know any of this, because there are still many, many unknowns. But at least we’re getting closer to the day when we’ll all have the benefit of real consumer and merchant feedback on real solutions. That will make mobile payments arena a whole lot more interesting and tangible. Can’t wait!
Karen Webster is the CEO of Market Platform Dynamics (MPD), a consulting firm that helps companies find, implement and monetize innovation. She serves as an advisor and member of the board for a number of companies operating in the payment, technology and digital media industries. More info here.
Post your comment
Comments
Karen, This is a much more balanced and, to my mind, realistic view of the mobile payments landscape than the reports that have been coming out of Nice. I am also "allergic" to NFC since the barriers to its adoption - handset, network operator, POS, merchant - are very high and rely on a lot of things coming together. I think that, perhaps in the end, Mr Rabois is right; make NFC a channel - proprietory or open - for payments and not a process.
Posted by Malcolm Rosier, 04/10/2011 9:33am (5 months ago)
fair analysis - i like the observation "since fat wallets in cyberspace is a non-issue" - i think that is going to strongly influence consumer adoption and the ability of large brands to gain market share. We will see a whole bunch of new offerings piggy-backing payment rails to drive and shape consumer experiences at Point of sale and point of service environments.
-Mustafa Shehabi
Posted by Mustafa Shehabi, 30/09/2011 1:40am (5 months ago)
You're correct Karen. I learned this in the days of Mondex and VisaCash. It didn't matter to consumers that a new card worked in Burger King but not MacDonalds, so long as it worked in ALL Burger Kings. Customers wanted to certainty of tender. If it turns out that - for example - customers like using their phones to pay at car parking, then it's important that they know which car parks they can use, and brand is the best way to communicate this. Hence the strategy of branded ubiquity (e.g., Starbucks) has turned out to be better than geographic ubiquity (e.g., all coffee shops in Manhattan).
Posted by Dave Birch, 29/09/2011 2:36pm (5 months ago)
Good stuff as usual, Karen.
So long as we restrict this to the US, I generally agree with your assessment,and would state it a bit differently: there is neither a compelling merchant nor consumer value proposition at present for mobile payment. And for the merchant, any change will include friction, in all cases for the clerk at POS and in the case of NFC, hardware changes.
So the solution that provide a good value proposition with the least friction will win.
My current view is that we'll have numerous mobile option in the market over the next few year, with none gaining much share. What volume mobile gets will come from transactions currently in cash, or things like transit systems.
And a generation from now, in the US, the majority of electronic spend, by dollar and maybe transaction volume, will still be using plastic.
Posted by David True, 29/09/2011 11:17am (5 months ago)
Karen,
Interesting but why do you always end your thoughts with a
general and vague conclusion?
All the best,
Ted
Posted by ted, 28/09/2011 10:21am (5 months ago)
RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments