Get all the best news and insights in payments everyday in your inbox.
2010 is a time of extraordinary change and upheaval in the cards and payments industry. Financial regulation threatens to derail decades of growth and profitability. The U.S. stands as the last industrialized country to rely on magnetic stripe cards, and this exposes us to unprecedented levels of payment fraud. The industry is deadlocked on new technology adoption, including chip and mobile.
The passage of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 governing debit card interchange rules looms large, rife with uncertainty on how the regulations will be defined.
Banks scrambling to replace lost fee revenue will likely shift focus to credit and prepaid, impose DDA and other fees, along with new account services and comprehensive pricing packages.
Consumers: Australia's example illustrates the consequences of interchange fees capping, in which consumer benefits failed to materialize.
Merchants benefit from lower acceptance costs for debit cards. In a surprising twist, incentives and steering could have the perverse result of driving consumers toward cash and checks.
Create a Tipping Point for NFC: The wave of the future, but the industry has been deadlocked for years. Banks and mobile network operators (MNOs) drag their feet hashing out business models and revenue arrangements. MNOs are reticent to acquire NFC handsets, and merchants reluctantly upgrade POS to accept contactless. Handset manufacturers have devices with NFC, but nobody buys them.
Over-worrying revenue sharing arrangements stifles innovation. Instead, imagining how to "expand the pie" energizes innovation. Examples, e.g. explosion of SMS messaging and online music sales, illustrate that a single visionary company can change the industry. Several players with millions of loyal followers have that opportunity, including Facebook, Apple, and PayPal, each of whom could trigger a viral effect. The bank that partners with the right game-changer will enjoy first-mover advantage and new revenue streams.
Launch Chip & PIN: The financial reform bill provides incentive for banks to invest in fraud prevention. For decades, the U.S. has looked the other way as the rest of the world deployed EMV technology to fight fraud. Changes in fraud, cost, revenue and new technology make today the right time for the U.S. to reconsider:
Implementing EMV would be lauded as a giant leap in the right direction. Banks would enjoy lowered fraud losses and earn adjustments to interchange as set by the Fed.
Banks today have an unprecedented opportunity to remake the card and payments industry and build toward a future in which payments are more secure and convenient, with promising opportunities in new businesses not even contemplated today.
Deborah can be reached at Deborah.baxley@capgemini.com.
World Payments Report 2010: Payments Volumes Resilient in the Crisis
Post your comment
Comments
Adopt real low value payment solution to enable profitable transactions using smart cards for amount less than 10 $ or 10 EUR. Pushing contacless as a solution doesn't cut it because merchants still recognize that they are being charges the same fees as for contact debit or credit. Contactless is just a form factor convenient for the cardholder but merchants have no financial incentive to accept it.
That would change the game. There is at least 1 LVP solution on the market that could change the game but payment schemes and banks are reluctant to take that route. Hopefully starting from 2011 they will have to.
Posted by Annon, 04/12/2010 7:35pm (1 year ago)
Today along with Debbie's comments on Mobile and EMV I read a most interesting manifesto coming out of the Merchant Advisory Group.
http://merchantadvisorygroup.org/PDFs/MAG_Mobile_Payments_Position_Paper.pdf
They make a sound case for exactly what Debbie suggests. They understand that the magnetic stripe is an aging technology and PCI is simply a quick expensive fix. They see Mobile and EMV as the future.
Posted by Philip Andreae, 30/11/2010 10:48am (1 year ago)
Please stop beating the mag stripe horse! Her name is Maggy. She runs the race quite well and always wins lengths ahead of her competition. She may be old, but she is by far the favorite and will be for quite awhile. Betting against her has proven to be costly. So stop betting against her or go find another race. Maggy has years of running and winning in the future.
Am I missing something?? Magnetic stripes on the back of cards do not cause "unprecedented levels of payment fraud"! Swipe fraud is a very small percent of card fraud. Card Not Present...that is a problem. Data Breaches...that is a problem. But swipe fraud???
Maybe I missed some industry report that shows skimming has gone to a new level and fraudsters just love going to retail stores so that they can swipe their fraudulent cards to purchase big screen TVs.
Chip and PIN would solve only one of our least significant fraud issues. There has been an overwhelming amount of attention put on by the C&P community that it is starting to get ridiculous.
So stop beating Maggy!!!
(This also includes Greenback, the horse that will never be retired)
Posted by Phil Huston, 30/11/2010 9:05am (1 year ago)
While Ms. Baxley correctly points out some obivous potential benefits to switching to EMV/CandP she overlooks that in Europe ATM theft has risen substantially since the implementation of EMV/CandP even for bank ATM/Debit cards.
She also fails to mention several black hat campaigns/contests that have been done/are underway for the best protocol to beat CandP systems.
Another fatal flaw in her article is that CandP can be overcome quite easily for one-time fraud for In Person transactions and thieves are already employing that in other parts of the world.
The final flaw is that CandP does not address Mobile Payments and Internet Payments as these are usually CNP (Card Not Present) transactions that receive no protection from CandP.
There are several solutions available in the market today that are superior in anti-fraud protection and far less costly than a full scale implementation of CandP that I would have expected a CapGemini staffer to include so I am assuming there is a vested interest here to implement a CandP program at one of their clients.
Posted by Michael J. Schultz, 29/11/2010 12:36pm (1 year ago)
Launching Chip & PIN in the US may be a way for banks to invest in fraud prevention, but the merchant community, particularly the c-store/petroleum retailer would be looking at a significant investment. While some new POS terminals might have EMV capability built in, the same is not true for gasoline dispensers. Since most consumers (+/-70%) use card based payment for gasoline purchases, this market is critical when considering the adoption of a new payment device. c-store/petroleum retailers can expect +/- $2,000 in additional costs for an EMV enabled device. Retrofits to current equipment may cost up to $9K per pump. One major manufacturer tells me that neither of these products is currently offered in the US market. Assuming the average petroleum retailer has 5 pumps (some larger stations have 10 to 20); the cost to retrofit to EMV in the U.S c-store/petroleum space is measured in $100’s of millions, if not billions of dollars.
One of the themes I hear from retailers, many of whom are still smarting from recent PCI compliance upgrades, is that future investment in payment technology should have a half-life longer than the life of a mosquito. Sorting out the long term long-term strategy for security and mobile technology and settling on technology standards would be a good first step in this process.
Posted by Peter Guidi, 29/11/2010 10:19am (1 year ago)
RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments