/commentary

PYMNTS Voice

New Global Payment Schemes: Imitation, the Sincerest Form of Flattery?

Posted by Margaret Weichert on 13 December 2010 | 0 Comments

Tags: Payment Networks, MasterCard, Visa, American Express, China Union Pay, CUP, Debit Cards

Throughout the 1980s and 1990s payment network consolidation in the US and Europe, resulted in a world with only 3 global credit card brands – Visa, MasterCard and American Express, supported by a host of regional/ local debit solutions. However, the desire to avoid the dominance of US brands and expand their domestic card markets, has driven players in China, India and Europe to contemplate their own competitive card schemes to compete with the global dominance of Visa, Mastercard and American Express.

0 comments | Read the full post

What’s Next with the Consumer Financial Protection Board: Insights from Elizabeth Warren’s “Making Credit Safer”

Posted by David S. Evans on 16 September 2010 | 1 Comments

Tags: Consumer Financial Protection Board, Elizabeth Warren, Making Credit Safer, Durbin, Financial Reform, Debit Card, David S. Evans

The Consumer Financial Protection Board, which was set up by Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act, is waiting for the President to appoint a director to organize the new agency and pursue its mandate to prevent unfair, deceptive and abusive practices. Insights into how the agency may go about its job, and think about the problem of consumer credit, can be gleaned from the forceful and influential article by Elizabeth Warren, along with Oren Bar-Gill, who has been the leading advocate for a new agency focused on consumer credit.

1 comments | Read the full post

Where There’s Smoke, There’s Fire?

Posted by Karen Webster on 20 April 2010 | 4 Comments

Tags: target, visa, interchange, credit card, debit card, loyalty

There’s a lot of speculation about the recent move by Target to abandon its Visa co-branded card in favor of its own private label store version. Some say that it is ‘back to the future’ and the start of a trend that will end up bifurcating the card market: general purpose payment and store-branded cards with little in between. Others say that this is a “one-off” by a big player known for making bold moves in the space (e.g. remember the Target Visa smart Card, which Money magazine cited “about as useful as a Ferrari in a traffic jam?”). Here are a few observations on the topic.

Once upon a time, co-branded cards were the cat’s meow. They were highly attractive to issuers because they accrued higher interchange fees and gave issuers and retailers a way to capture affinity (and monetize it). You could find a card for just about any affinity…from your favorite store to your favorite school to your favorite charity. The theory of the case was that affinity = top of wallet.

As these programs proliferated, it suddenly became harder and harder for retailers to associate increased traffic (code for sales) to the use of these (more expensive) cards. And, now in the age of more stringent card regulations and tightening credit, it has also become more difficult for issuers to justify the economics that come with some of these programs, which sometimes includes revenue guarantees back to the co-branded partner.

So, it’s probably not that surprising that we’re seeing some flux in this whole space at both ends: retailers with the scale of a Target exploring their options, in spite of the receiveables’/risk management issues that plague this category of credit card, and issuers reducing the number of affinity cards that they support (e.g. Chase/Starbucks, Citi/Home Depot).

Target says that it’s done a bunch of research and suggests that it gets more incremental sales from customers who use its own store card, and will now have better economics to create additional incentives (coupons, for example) that will drive more sales, even after accounting for the risk (and also probably after discerning that it does not have to comply with some of the same “income verification” issues at POS that they once feared the CARD act would require.)

But, as they say, for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. Target’s announcement comes about two weeks after one made by American Express and Macy’s to issue a co-branded card, and a month or so after Chase and Hyatt announced a co-branded card program. So, it seems hard to make the case that store card programs are going the way of the hula hoop any time soon.

I don’t have any inside baseball information on this, but wonder if Target’s decision wasn’t based on an insight as simple as their consumers used their co-branded cards like a store card. By that I mean, that customers with a Target card, were, by and large, using the card at Target exclusively and not as their “top of wallet” outside of that store. If that is the case, then the economics for them could be far better if they managed their own program. And, if that’s the case, it might also imply that there might be more value created by the more “general” affinity card programs: charity, sports, and travel, where the incentives and the rewards accrue to the underlying passion, with better redemption options - and where there is real evidence of top of wallet placement.

I was talking with someone today about how sometimes the mistake the people make in thinking about innovation is trying to make it too big, when incremental improvements sometimes deliver a more compelling use case and better margins. Maybe those who see a much bigger story here are operating under a similar precept.

What will be interesting to watch is how moves like what Target and others in this space are doing affect loyalty programs and rewards/redemption options more generally. The new realities of the economic environment and financial regulation will force a new layer of decisioning about the one thing that really impacts what everyone in the ecosystem cares about – sales. I think we’ve just started to scratch the surface on the new ideas and implementations that will be used to drive affinity to cards, retailers and card products.

4 comments | Read the full post

The Invisible Engines that Drive Innovation and Transform Industries

Posted by David S. Evans on 8 March 2010 | 0 Comments

Tags: invisible engines, mit, payments, applications, software, disruptive technology, credit card, debit card, processing, issuer, code, firefox, facebook, social network, microsoft, windows, apple, iphone, mobile, security, api, youtube, google, catalysts, sdk, developer, development

The use of software platforms to drive innovation and transform industries has exploded since the 2006 publication of my book Invisible Engines with MIT Professor and former Sloan School Dean Richard Schmalensee and Harvard Business School Professor Andrei Hagiu. Around the globe, invisible engines are ushering in a new era of technological change based on software. The Apple iPhone has shaken the mobile phone industry worldwide in part by creating a massive applications business built on the phone's operating system. Firefox has revolutionized the browser industry by encouraging developers to write add-ons and in doing so toppled Microsoft's Internet Explorer from dominance in many countries. Facebook has created a powerful social networking platform by opening itself up to developers. Amazon has started cloud-computing platform that enables entrepreneurs to access its vast software code, hardware and global communication systems over the Internet.

0 comments | Read the full post

Shanghai Surprise

Posted by David S. Evans on 18 December 2009 | 0 Comments

Tags: china, payments, credit card, tsys, foreign networks, china union pay, debit card, icbc, cup

China emerged in the last decade as a major force in payments. Coinciding with the enormous growth of the economy, China has rapidly increased the acceptance of cards by merchants and the use of cards to pay by consumers. Chinese banks have expanded their issuance of debit cards and have moved aggressively into credit cards. In 2008, there were 16.7 billion card transactions that resulted in a total spend on cards in China of 127.16 trillion RMB ($18.75 trillion). More than a million merchants accepted cards that year.

0 comments | Read the full post

/commentary

PYMNTS Voice

New Global Payment Schemes: Imitation, the Sincerest Form of Flattery?

What’s Next with the Consumer Financial Protection Board: Insights from Elizabeth Warren’s “Making Credit Safer”

Where There’s Smoke, There’s Fire?

The Invisible Engines that Drive Innovation and Transform Industries

Shanghai Surprise

Most Popular

for pymnts

About

Quick Links

Briefing Rooms

Advertisers