A PYMNTS Company

Two Artificial Intelligence Bills Introduced In US Congress

 |  June 11, 2023

On Thursday, two bipartisan artificial intelligence bills were introduced by US senators in response to the increasing interest in addressing issues related to the technology.

According to Reuters, there are two proposed laws. One aims to ensure transparency from the US government when utilizing AI for communication with individuals, while the other seeks to establish an office to assess the country’s competitiveness in emerging technologies.

As the use of AI continues to increase, lawmakers are starting to explore the need for updated regulations. In recent news, ChatGPT, an AI program capable of written question answering, was made widely accessible.

Read more: US FTC’s Chief Says They Seek To Curb Risks Of Artificial Intelligence

A bill was introduced by Senators Gary Peters, Mike Braun and James Lankford, which mandates U.S. government agencies to inform individuals when they are being interacted with by AI. Peters, a Democrat, chairs the Homeland Security committee while Braun and Lankford are Republicans.

The bill mandates that agencies establish a mechanism for individuals to challenge decisions made by AI.

“The federal government needs to be proactive and transparent with AI utilization and ensure that decisions aren’t being made without humans in the driver’s seat,” said Braun in a statement.

Senators Michael Bennet and Mark Warner, both Democrats, along with Republican Senator Todd Young, proposed a measure to create an Office of Global Competition Analysis that would prioritize the United States’ advancement in artificial intelligence.

“We cannot afford to lose our competitive edge in strategic technologies like semiconductors, quantum computing, and artificial intelligence to competitors like China,” Bennet said.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer scheduled three briefings for senators on artificial intelligence this week, including the first classified briefing to inform lawmakers on the topic.

Google’s Privacy Class Action Lawsuit Moves Forward After Court Rejects Dismissal Request Google's Privacy Class Action Lawsuit Moves Forward

Google’s Privacy Class Action Lawsuit Moves Forward After Court Rejects Dismissal Request

 |  January 8, 2025

A federal judge has denied Google’s attempt to have a privacy class action lawsuit dismissed, allowing the case to proceed to trial. The lawsuit, filed by users of both Android and non-Android devices, claims that Google continued to collect personal data from their mobile phones despite users opting to disable the tracking feature via the Web & App Activity settings.

According to a Reuters report, Chief Judge Richard Seeborg of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled that Google had not sufficiently disclosed how its data tracking functions, nor had it secured valid user consent. In his 20-page decision issued on Tuesday, Seeborg dismissed Google’s argument that its basic record-keeping did not harm anyone and rejected claims that users were adequately informed about the company’s data practices. The lawsuit alleges that Google violated California’s law against unauthorized computer access, accusing the company of capturing and storing users’ browsing histories without their consent.

The case centers around accusations that Google continued to collect data even after users took steps to prevent it, such as switching off the tracking button in their privacy settings. The plaintiffs assert that Google’s actions were a violation of their privacy rights, and their concerns about unauthorized data collection have led to a legal challenge that is now scheduled to go to trial in August 2025.

Read more: Google Faces Cease-and-Desist Order from Japan’s Fair Trade Commission

In his ruling, Seeborg noted that Google’s conduct could be perceived as “highly offensive” by reasonable users. This was partly due to internal communications within Google, cited in the decision, which indicated that the company deliberately kept some details about its tracking practices vague. Per Reuters, these communications revealed that some employees had raised concerns about how the company distinguished between data collected inside and outside Google accounts, with some suggesting that full transparency could alarm users.

While Seeborg acknowledged that the employees’ intentions may have simply been aimed at improving Google’s services, he emphasized that the dispute over whether the company’s actions were misleading or simply part of standard product development remains a triable issue of fact. In his opinion, the case should proceed to trial, where a jury will ultimately decide whether Google’s conduct violated user privacy rights.

This legal battle began in July 2020, and it now heads toward a jury trial set for August 18, 2025. Notably, this is not the first time Google has faced such accusations. Last August, a federal appeals court in San Francisco revived another lawsuit that accused the company of tracking users of its Chrome browser even after they chose not to synchronize their browser data with their Google accounts.

Source: Reuters