America’s consumer protection watchdog says an examination has uncovered illegal fees in several industries.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced Wednesday (March 8) that its recent Supervisory Highlights report found “unlawful junk fees” in auto loan, student loan and mortgage servicing, payday lending and bank account deposits.
The announcement comes as the CFPB and the Biden administration are pushing for a larger crackdown on illegal and/or unnecessary fees paid by consumers.
“For years, junk fees have been creeping across the economy,” CFPB Director Rohit Chopra said in a news release. “Our report describes a host of illegal junk fee practices that the CFPB has uncovered across the financial services sector.”
According to the CFPB, the examination found junk fees that range from surprise overdraft fees at banks to “out of bounds and fake” late fees by auto loan servicers.
Read more: CFPB Fine Prompts Senators to Demand More Info From US Bank
Last week, the bureau warned that the financial products used to deliver Social Security and unemployment payments often include high surcharges that cut into people’s benefits.
A report from the CFPB outlined a number of problems with the system including the fact that some prepaid cards can charge several fees — for example, maintenance, balance inquiry, customer service or ATM fees – that “can quickly erode the amount of available funds.”
The agency cites figures from the Federal Reserve that show 2020 administrators of prepaid cards collected $1.3 billion in transaction fees in 2020 on $409 billion in public benefits.
The CFPB also insists that fees can mean uneven access to benefits in different states, as Temporary Assistance for Needy Families and Unemployment are administered at the state or county level, leading to a variety of program structure and a variety of fees.
The CFPB’s latest announcement came as the Biden administration met with state legislators to drum up support for its anti-junk fee campaign on the state level.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand