Media startup Semafor is reportedly seeking to buy out investor Sam Bankman-Fried.
The effort, reported Wednesday (Jan. 18) by the New York Times, adds Semafor to a growing list of organizations and people that have tried to separate themselves from Bankman-Fried, the disgraced founder of collapsed cryptocurrency exchange FTX.
“We are planning to repurchase Sam Bankman-Fried’s interest in Semafor and to place the money into a separate account until the relevant legal authorities provide guidance as to where the money should be returned,” Semafor co-founder and CEO Justin Smith told the Times.
The report noted that Bankman-Fried was the company’s largest investor thanks to a $10 million contribution. Sources tell the newspaper Semafor’s efforts to find funding have so far yielded no new investments.
Related: Bankman-Fried Legal Team Brings ‘El Chapo,’ Ghislaine Maxwell Experience to Defense
Semafor isn’t the only media company to which Bankman-Fried had donated. Last month, the nonprofit newsroom ProPublica announced it would return a grant funded by a Bankman-Fried family foundation.
The grant was meant to support investigations into the COVID-19 pandemic, biosecurity and public health preparedness, the organization said in a news release.
ProPublica also said it ended its relationship with the foundation “following allegations of fraudulent activities against Sam Bankman-Fried.”
Last month also saw the founders of the Solana blockchain try to distance themselves from the former FTX CEO.
“I’m still trying to square what I perceive him to be and like what actually happened,” Solana’s Anatoly Yakovenko said. “It just feels really, really jarring.”
Bankman-Fried was charged by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) in December with eight criminal counts that range from wire fraud to various conspiracy counts. He could face decades in prison if found guilty at his trial, scheduled for later this year.
The 30-year-old former crypto wunderkind has insisted he is innocent in the events that led to the downfall of his company and the loss of billions of missing customer funds.
Free on bail and living at his parents’ house, Bankman-Fried has also maintained a high profile, writing a blog post last week about how he could save his former company.
He also supplied a comment for Bloomberg News this week wishing the best to former FTX President Brett Harrison. Harrison had just published a lengthy Twitter thread blasting Bankman-Fried and trying to distance himself from the collapse of his former company.
“I never could have guessed that underlying these kinds of issues — which I’d seen at other more mature firms in my career and believed not to be fatal to business success — was multi-billion-dollar fraud,” Harrison wrote, adding that he was “shocked” by Bankman-Fried’s alleged fraud.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand