In the wake of news that his former friends and peers are cooperating with authorities, FTX crypto founder Sam Bankman-Fried is expected to enter a plea at his criminal arraignment in Manhattan, New York, next week.
Whether that plea proclaims his guilt or innocence remains to be seen, but Reutersreported Wednesday (Dec. 28) that the disgraced founder of the since-failed FTX cryptocurrency exchange is scheduled to appear before a judge on Jan. 3, 2023, in federal court in New York City, according to court documents.
He’ll be arraigned before Judge Lewis Kaplan. The previous judge overseeing Bankman-Fried’s criminal case, Ronnie Abrams, recused herself last week (Dec. 23) because her husband is a partner at Polk Davis & Wardell, a law firm that advised Bankman-Fried’s cryptocurrency company FTX last year. Abrams’ husband, Greg Andres, was not associated with the FTX work.
Bankman-Fried has been charged by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) with eight criminal counts that range from wire fraud to various conspiracy counts. Bankman-Fried has maintained his innocence in the events that led to the rapid implosion of his crypto empire and the loss of billions of misallocated customer funds.
Read more: FTX United States Extradition Remains Unresolved, Bankman-Fried Still Imprisoned
An arraignment is the formal reading of criminal charges against a defendant in that defendant’s presence. Its purpose is to ensure the accused is properly aware of the charges.
After being read the charges, a defendant may enter a plea or — depending in which legal jurisdiction the arraignment is being held — may choose not to submit one.
The news of his expected plea follows the news, as reported by PYMNTS, that both Caroline Ellison, former CEO of FTX sister firm Alameda Research, and Gary Wang, FTX’s former chief technology officer, have pleaded guilty to the fraud charges brought against them and agreed to cooperate with authorities.
That news, which was kept embargoed from the media until Bankman-Fried was extradited to the U.S., has no doubt put pressure on the one-time wunderkind of crypto.
In Ellison’s testimony, she described and admitted guilt to a number of fraudulent acts she claims to have participated in going back to 2019.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand