Bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange FTX owes its top 50 creditors close to $3.1 billion and is reportedly considering either a sale or reorganization.
Meanwhile, FTX’s new CEO — who recently said he’d never seen a company so poorly run — painted a slightly rosier picture of the exchange’s subsidiaries after beginning a strategic review of the firm’s assets, the Financial Times reported Saturday (Nov. 19).
“Based on our review over the past week, we are pleased to learn that many regulated or licensed subsidiaries of FTX, within and outside of the United States, have solvent balance sheets, responsible management, and valuable franchises,” said John J. Ray III, who became the company’s chief executive following its bankruptcy filing on Nov. 11.
Related: House Oversight Committee Requests Documents and Information From FTX
The company is due in bankruptcy court Tuesday (Nov. 22). A report Sunday (Nov. 20) by Reuters, citing court documents, said FTX owes $1.45 billion to its top 10 creditors.
This news is the latest chapter after two weeks of turmoil for FTX that began with a run on the firm’s assets, which triggered a liquidity crisis. At first, it seemed like rival crypto trading platform Binance might step in to rescue FTX with an acquisition.
However, Binance walked away from the deal days later in part because of reports that American regulators, including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, had begun looking into FTX.
There were also reports that former CEO Sam Bankman-Fried had used FTX customer funds to prop up sister firm Alameda Research. Since then, more reports have suggested that some of that money has apparently disappeared.
By the end of the week, FTX and 130 of its affiliated companies had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Further revelations about the company’s leadership followed, such as reports last week that Bankman-Fried sold a $300 million stake in the company in 2021.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand