The UK competition regulator said it would launch a more in-depth investigation into Korean Air Lines and Asiana Airlines if the carriers fail to allay concerns that their proposed merger would lead to higher prices for passengers and impact cargo operators.
The airlines have until Nov 21 to submit proposals to address competition concerns, the Competition and Markets Authority said on Monday (Nov 14). The CMA then has until Nov 28 to consider whether to accept in principle or refer the deal for an in-depth phase 2 investigation, it said in a statement.
“Korean Air and Asiana Airlines are the two main players on the London to Seoul route and the deal risks UK customers and businesses paying over the odds of receiving a lower quality of service,” CMA Senior Mergers Director Colin Raftery said.
Related: UK Probes Korean Air Lines’ $1.29B Asiana Buy
Korean Air announced its plan to buy Asiana in 2020, as the aviation industry was hammered by the Covid pandemic. The transaction was initially due to close at the end of last year, but has been repeatedly extended amid concern from some regulators that the carrier would be overly dominant on some routes.
Korean Air’s parent Hanjin Group said at the outset that the main goal of the acquisition was to stabilize South Korea’s aviation industry and improve competitiveness. Countries with a population of less than 100 million people generally have only one full-service carrier, it said.
Korean Air and Asiana are the only carriers operating direct passenger flights between London and Seoul, so the only competition the merged business would face on the route would be from indirect flights, which the CMA said were “a much weaker option for customers”.
Around 150,000 passengers travelled from London to Seoul in 2019, before the pandemic, and demand is expected to return to that level in the next few years, the CMA said.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand