The judge presiding over the antitrust case against Rogers Communications’s takeover of a rival has asked lawyers representing the companies and Canada’s antitrust czar whether there’s a potential solution to the impasse stalling the deal.
Chief Justice Paul Crampton of the Federal Court ordered legal counsel for Rogers, Shaw Communications Inc. and the federal Competition Bureau to a case-management conference at 3 p.m. Ottawa time Tuesday, according to a notice published Monday afternoon.
In the meantime, Crampton asked all sides to “reflect” on whether it’s possible to find a solution that doesn’t involve blocking the entire transaction.
Rogers and Shaw have agreed to sell Shaw’s Freedom Mobile division, which has more than 2 million customers, to Quebecor Inc. in an attempt to resolve concerns that Rogers would gain too much power in the wireless sector.
The divestiture would shrink the Rogers-Shaw deal so that it’s primarily a merger of two companies that offer internet, cable and other services in different regions of Canada. But so far, that hasn’t been enough to satisfy Competition Commissioner Matthew Boswell, who has pressed ahead with an argument that the transaction would harm consumers by reducing competition.
Crampton’s orders asks the parties to consider whether “alternative relief” — a change to deal terms that helps ensure competition — is possible, so that “it would not be necessary to continue to seek an order directing the respondents not to proceed with the entire proposed transaction.” The respondents in the case include Rogers and Shaw.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand