Surgical Care Affiliates, a subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group, was indicted this week by a federal grand jury on charges that it entered agreements with competitors to not poach executives.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) alleges that the company, which operates outpatient medical centers, engaged in “two bilateral conspiracies” with other healthcare companies that aimed to avoid competition between them for senior executives, which violates the Sherman Act.
One agreement lasted from as early as May 2010 through October 2017, and the second lasted from February 2012 to July 2017, the DOJ said. UnitedHealth acquired Surgical Care Affiliates in 2017, and it is now a part of Optum.
“The charges demonstrate the Antitrust Division’s continued commitment to criminally prosecute collusion in America’s labor markets,” said Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim of the DOJ’s Antitrust Division in a statement.
“A freely competitive employment market is essential to the health of our economy and the mobility of American workers. Along with our law enforcement partners, the division will ensure that companies who illegally deprive employees of competitive opportunities are not immune from our antitrust laws,” Delrahim said.
Read More: No Poaching Agreements and Antitrust Enforcement
The DOJ said these charges are the first in an ongoing investigation. A Sherman Act violation carries a maximum penalty of $100 million to companies.
In a statement (PDF), Surgical Care Affiliates said it rejects the charges, as the government is applying antitrust laws in a way for which “there is no president or foundation.”
“This matter involves alleged conduct seven years before UnitedHealth Group acquired SCA and does not involve any SCA ambulatory surgery centers, their joint owners, physician partners, current leadership or any other UnitedHealth Group companies. SCA disagrees with the government’s position and will vigorously defend itself against these unjustified allegations,” Surgical Care Affiliates said.
“SCA takes its legal responsibilities seriously and works every day to ensure compliance with applicable laws,” the company said.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand