Chicago drivers on Tuesday asked a US appeals court to force the city to open up the operation of its parking meters to competition, as the plaintiffs’ lawyers pressed their claims that an exclusive public-private partnership worth $1.1 billion violates federal antitrust law.
The plaintiffs filed their opening brief in the Chicago-based 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals, arguing that a US federal judge was wrong to conclude Chicago Parking Meters enjoys immunity from antitrust law based on the 75-year deal it reached with the city in 2008.
The drivers are not seeking money damages but want to compel Chicago to consider competitors.
“Chicago has given CPM an unregulated 75-year monopoly depriving the city of its full regulatory authority over the streets and public ways not for three or four years, but rather, for close to a century,” Thomas Geoghegan of Despres, Schwartz & Geoghegan wrote for the plaintiffs. “And it is an exclusive contract that is impossible to cancel unless the city pays billions and billions of dollars to do so.”
Geoghegan on Wednesday declined to comment about the case, filed in 2021 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
Chicago Parking Meters’ lawyers at Winston & Strawn, including Dan Webb, co-executive chairman of the firm, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Last September, they urged U.S. District Judge Matthew Kennelly to dismiss the drivers’ lawsuit. The defense lawyers argued the plaintiffs had not shown they were harmed and that the company was immune from federal antitrust liability.
In dismissing the case, Kennelly in January applied the “state action” legal doctrine that can shield certain local government activities from federal antitrust liability.
The Chicago plaintiffs assert in their appeal that the shield does not extend to a private entity.
Geoghegan’s court filing said there is no “‘clearly articulated’ state policy in favor of turning over the control of city curb space to a private party.”
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand