Washington has become the first US state to set earnings standards for ride-hailing companies after Governor Jay Inslee signed into law a minimum pay standard for Lyft and Uber drivers.
As Reuters reported Friday (April 1), the law — signed Thursday (March 31) — said Uber and Lyft drivers in Washington will earn a minimum of $1.17 per mile and 34 cents per minute with minimum pay of $3 for each trip.
But while the law gives drivers things like paid sick time, family medical leave, long-term care programs and workers’ compensation, it also bans local governments from imposing additional requirements for the ride-hailing companies and said that the drivers are not employees, a sore point between labor groups and gig economy giants.
Uber and Lyft have fought several legal and political battles across the US and elsewhere to push back against laws and propositions to have their drivers declared direct employees, which would qualify them for a series of benefits and impose numerous requirements on the ride-sharing companies.
The law does not affect a measure passed in Seattle in 2020 that gives drivers a minimum pay of $1.38 per mile, 59 cents per minute and a per-trip minimum of $5.17.
Reuters noted that the law was supported by Uber and Lyft.
“This new law decisively gives drivers what they want — to stay independent while gaining historic new benefits and protections,” Uber’s head of public policy in the Western U.S., Ramona Prieto, said in a statement.
Prieto said Uber hoped the law could be replicated in other cities, states and countries.
“Drivers achieved this win because labor organizations, legislators and app-based companies listened to them, and then worked together to drive a historic bill that works for them,” Lyft’s head of government relations, Jen Hensley, said in a statement.
Reuters said the law was backed by the Teamsters union Local 117, which had also fought for the Seattle pay standard.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand