Amer Sports Inc., the main agent in Japan for tennis rackets made by US company Wilson Sporting Goods, is said to be working with the Fair Trade Commission to avoid being charged with violating antitrust laws.
Amer Sports Inc. has submitted a plan to the country’s watchdog to demonstrate that it has stopped blocking efforts by other retailers to import the equipment from overseas sellers and thereby level the playing field in Japan.
JFTC investigators searched the offices of Amer Sports Japan Inc. in September 2020 over suspicions the company actively prevented retailers from importing Wilson Sporting equipment.
As well as Wilson tennis rackets, the company handles products made by French sports equipment manufacturer Salomon and high performance outdoor equipment maker Arc’teryx, according to sources.
Amer Sports Japan allegedly applied pressure on foreign sellers so they did not sell Wilson tennis rackets to Japanese companies seeking to import the equipment through other channels.
Some companies are still facing difficulties handling Wilson products even after the JFTC began its investigation of Amer Sports Japan, according to sources in the sporting goods sector.
An Amer Sports Japan representative said the company was continuing to deal with the investigation by the JFTC but declined further comment.
Interfering with efforts by other importers to purchase products is considered a violation of the Anti-Monopoly Law.
The JFTC will end its investigation of violations by the company if it determines that Amer Sports Japan is keeping to its side of the bargain in terms of the plan it submitted and that the competitive environment for Wilson rackets has improved, sources said.
Read More: Competition Law and Sports in Japan: A New Olympic Legacy?
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Norton Rose Fulbright has announced the addition of two seasoned professionals, Veronica Pinotti and Martino Sforza, to its antitrust and competition practice in Milan. According to a statement released by the firm on Monday, both lawyers have joined as partners, bringing a wealth of expertise in various facets of competition law.
Martino Sforza’s practice focuses on a range of areas, including consumer protection, data privacy, and regulated markets, in addition to his extensive work in antitrust matters. His broad experience makes him a valuable addition to the firm’s Milan office.
Veronica Pinotti, also joining from White & Case, specializes in advising clients on complex legal matters involving joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions, cartels, and abuse of dominance. She is also highly experienced in navigating state aid issues and regulatory concerns.
Source: Bloomberg
Featured News
Norton Rose Adds Antitrust Partners in Italy
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Lawsuit Over Google’s Search Monopoly Proceeds in CA Court
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Digital Markets Act at Two Years: Enforcement in a Shifting Political Climate
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
EU Expands Tech Oversight with Updated Anti-Hate Speech Code
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Cargill Settles Turkey Price-Fixing Lawsuit for $32.5 Million
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Pharmacy Benefit Managers
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Untangling the PBM Mess
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Using Data, Not Anecdotes, to Analyze Criticisms of Pharmacy Benefit Managers
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Vertical Integration and PBMs: What, Me Worry?
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
The Economics of Benefit Management in Prescription-Drug Markets
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI