Mallinckrodt filed for bankruptcy last year to resolve thousands of lawsuits accusing it of fueling the opioid epidemic, but now faces new antitrust claims.
According to Reuters Humana and Attestor, allege that not only did Mallinckrodt engage in anti-competitive practices by inflating Acthar’s prices before the bankruptcy in violation of antitrust laws, but that it has continued charging those high rates during the case. The insurers argue that since they have had to continue paying amounts they believe are illegal, they should be entitled to senior priority status in Mallinckrodt’s creditor payment structure.
Related: Humana’s Antitrust Claims Over Acthar Can Advance
Lawyers said they need to resolve this matter before US Bankruptcy Judge John Dorsey, who is overseeing the Chapter 11 case, can rule on the plan. It aims to cut $1.3 billion from Mallinckrodt’s overall debt and set up a trust for plaintiffs that have brought opioid-related claims against the company worth around $1.7 billion.
Acthar-related claims, which Mallinckrodt estimates to be around $1.4 billion, are in line for a total recovery of $7.5 million. The insurers say the actual amount of the claims is “billions” higher than Mallinckrodt’s estimate.
Mallinckrodt says the insurers’ claims for damages do not qualify as “actual administrative expenses” that are typically paid off first in a corporate bankruptcy.
Other individuals and entities that have brought Acthar-related antitrust claims have also objected to the proposed plan. They argue it provides inappropriate rewards for management and improperly favors opioid claimants over their claims.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand