By Robert D. Atkinson, Wall Street Journal
When it comes to technology and the economy, the U.S. is grappling with two contradictory goals: competing with China in advanced technology industries and ramping up antitrust enforcement against leading U.S. tech companies.
Antimonopoly advocates argue that we can have our cake and eat it too. Go ahead and break up big tech, they say; we can still compete with China. But there is a long history of U.S. antitrust actions against technology companies, and the results suggest regulators should exercise caution.
Consider the case of Western Electric, AT&T ’s equipment subsidiary. By the early 1920s, it had factories in Austria, Belgium, Canada, China, Germany, France, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Russia and the U.K. But because AT&T relied on it exclusively for equipment, in 1925 the Justice Department threatened AT&T with breakup unless it divested Western Electric’s foreign assets, creating International Telephone & Telegraph and ultimately giving birth to robust foreign-owned competitors.
Continue Reading…
Featured News
Court Dismisses Monopoly Claims Against Tempur Sealy
Oct 18, 2024 by
CPI
Philadelphia City Council Advances Legislation to Tackle Rent Price-Fixing
Oct 17, 2024 by
CPI
FTC Probes Deere for Potential Anti-Competitive Repair Practices
Oct 17, 2024 by
CPI
Britain’s Ofcom to Outline Strict Guidelines for Tackling Illegal Online Content
Oct 17, 2024 by
CPI
EU Considers Expanding Potential Fines for X, Targeting Musk’s Broader Business Empire
Oct 17, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh