The Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice said Friday that enforcers will still allow mergers to clear the review process early in certain situations, despite the temporary suspension of granting early termination (ET) under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act.
On February 4, 2021, the Federal Trade Commission, with the support of the Department of Justice, announced the temporary suspension of granting early termination (ET) under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act and its implementing rules (HSR Act). This decision reflected a need to pause during the transition to a new administration combined with the unprecedented volume of HSR filings.
The FTC and the DOJ clarified that this temporary suspension does not apply in at least two circumstances, each involving a grant of ET after the investigating agency has issued a Request for Additional Information (Second Request).
First, sometimes the FTC or DOJ may issue a Second Request but determine through investigation prior to the parties’ substantial compliance with the Second Request that the transaction is unlikely to substantially lessen competition. In that scenario, the agency has received all of the information it needs and the investigation has resolved any competition concerns, but the parties cannot close their transaction because they have not substantially complied with the Second Request, as required by Section 18a(e)(2) of the HSR Act, to trigger the second waiting period. Typically, when an investigation resolves competition concerns, the agencies use their discretion to grant early termination of the second waiting period, and the grant of ET allows the parties to close their transaction.
Second, and similarly, when parties receive a Second Request, but then work with the agency to negotiate a Consent Agreement to resolve any competition concerns, the parties may not ever fully comply with a Second Request. Once again, in this scenario, although the parties have resolved the agency’s concerns by remedying potential harm to competition through a Consent Agreement, the parties cannot close until the agency affirmatively grants ET, due to clear language of the HSR Act provisions. In this scenario, the agencies routinely grant ET to allow the parties to close on the remedied transaction.
The Agencies will grant ET in both of the scenarios described above, even while the temporary general ET suspension remains in place. The Federal Trade Commission appreciates the patience of those making HSR filings while we continue to review our procedures.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand