The House Judiciary antitrust subcommittee is staffing up as it works to finish its investigation into the competitive impact of tech giants.
The antitrust panel has brought on two new staffers in recent months as it wades through documents from Apple, Amazon, Facebook, and Google in the competition review.
Former IBM consultant Anna Lenhart, a Congressional Innovation Fellow, joined the staff this month as a technical expert, a person familiar with the hire told Axios. Lenhart, a Carnegie Mellon graduate, most recently focused on artificial intelligence and ethics for IBM.
Former Public Knowledge policy director Phillip Berenbroick joined the subcommittee as counsel in January.
Antitrust Subcommittee Chairman David Cicilline has said he expects the investigation to produce a bipartisan report outlining its findings by the end of the first quarter. He also intends to introduce legislation related to the report.
Cicilline has said he wants to hear from major tech company CEOs, something the White House has also encouraged, according to a recent report by The Hill.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has filed a lawsuit against PepsiCo, accusing the company of engaging in illegal price discrimination by providing preferential treatment to a major retailer, according to NBC. While the retailer is not named in the lawsuit, sources familiar with the matter told CNBC that Walmart is at the center of the allegations.
The FTC claims that PepsiCo violated the Robinson-Patman Act, a federal law designed to ensure fair competition among businesses. The law prohibits companies from offering different prices or benefits to competing buyers for the same product, as well as from selectively granting allowances such as advertising reimbursements. Per NBC, the commission alleges that PepsiCo extended promotional payments, allowances, and advertising tools to Walmart that were not made available to its competitors.
In response to the lawsuit, PepsiCo has strongly denied the allegations. The company issued a statement to CNBC asserting that the FTC’s claims are both legally and factually incorrect. “PepsiCo strongly disputes the FTC’s allegations, and the partisan manner in which the suit was filed. We will vigorously present our case in court,” the company stated. PepsiCo also emphasized that its practices align with industry standards and insisted it does not engage in favoritism by offering discounts or promotional benefits to select customers.
The lawsuit, which has been filed in the Southern District of New York, is currently sealed. According to NBC, Walmart has not yet commented on the matter.
The FTC’s renewed focus on enforcing the Robinson-Patman Act signals a broader effort to address competitive imbalances in the marketplace, particularly among large retailers. This lawsuit could have significant implications for pricing and promotional practices across the consumer goods industry, depending on its outcome.
Source: NBC
Featured News
PepsiCo Sued Over Alleged Price Discrimination Involving Walmart
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
Regulators Approve Conditions for Multibillion-Dollar Oil Mergers
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Reaches Settlement with Private Equity Firm Over Antitrust Allegations in Texas
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Raises Antitrust Concerns Over Big Tech’s AI Partnerships
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
MultiPlan and Insurers Move to Dismiss Antitrust Allegations Amid Growing Legal Challenges
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand