By Robert Connolly, Cartel Capers
I explained in an earlier blog post that a criminal antitrust case had reached the Supreme Court where defendants convicted of bid rigging at public real estate foreclosure auctions had challenged the constitutionality of the per se rule. On Monday, the Supreme Court declined to review the criminal antitrust convictions, leaving in place the per se rule in criminal antitrust cases.
As usual, the Supreme Court offered no explanation for denying cert in this case. There is a Law 360 article on the case by Anne Cullen, January 13, 2020, Justices Skip Case Over ‘Per Se’ Rule In Antitrust Convictions, (behind paywall).
The defendants were joined in seeking Supreme Court review by amicus briefs filed by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and the Due Process Institute…
Featured News
Swisscom’s Fastweb-Vodafone Italia Merger Gains Momentum with Antitrust Approval Pending
Nov 24, 2024 by
CPI
Novo Holdings Nears EU Approval for $16.5 Billion Catalent Acquisition
Nov 24, 2024 by
CPI
Australia Drops Plan to Fine Tech Giants for Misinformation Spread
Nov 24, 2024 by
CPI
Michael Jordan’s Racing Team Drops Antitrust Appeal Against NASCAR
Nov 24, 2024 by
CPI
EU Closes Apple E-Book Antitrust Probe After Complaint Dropped
Nov 24, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI