The Belgian Competition Authority (BMA) has suspended the planned network sharing venture between Proximux and Orange Belgium until March 16, while it collects more information on the plans, reported Telecom Paper. This follows a complaint from the third mobile operator in Belgium, Telenet.
The operator announced the plans in July, and Telenet filed a complaint in November. Telenet claimed the two companies together have a 75% market share and a “quasi monopoly” in the business segment, and their joint venture could discourage infrastructure competition in the market.
The BMA stated it will await further information from the investigation underway by the telecom authority BIPT into the joint venture, and to hear more from the BIPT’s discussions with Orange and Proximus. Orange and Proximus stated the operators made a series of commitments to the BIPT to help clarify their intentions and resolve the regulator’s concerns. The delay given by the BMA will give the authorities more time to study these responses, the operators said.
Telenet stated it was satisfied with the preliminary order, but called for a thorough investigation by the BMA and BIPT. The authorities need to take into account earlier decisions by the European Commission on such ventures, such as its ongoing investigation into O2 and T-Mobile’s network sharing in Czechia, Telenet stated . This is a similar, but less extensive network venture, over which the Commission has competition concerns.
The BMA stated the suspension blocks the transfer of personnel at Orange and Proximus and signing of any binding documents. However, they may proceed with requests for proposals for network equipment and selecting staff for the venture. Given the potential positive effects of the cooperation and the time needed to investigate Telenet’s complaint, the regulator stated it decided to not suspend the deal until the complaint case is fully resolved.
Full Content: Telecom Paper
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand