![](https://www.pymnts.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/shutterstock_1464427247-e1573823320330-3.jpg)
By Scott Helfstein, Harvard Business Review
Since 1850, the U.S. has gone through cycles of protectionism and antitrust activity, but the two have never coincided —until now. The U.S. has shifted markedly towards protectionist policy, increasing tariffs over the past 18 months while simultaneously launching a series of antitrust investigations (into Big Tech and the auto industry, to name just two). Protectionist cycles usually last about a decade, while antitrust cycles extend further.
Each cycle is driven by a different set of fundamental forces. Protectionism stems from concerns over foreign influence and a desire to maintain the international status quo. Antitrust activity, by contrast, is driven by the desire to change the domestic status quo by increasing competition and weakening entrenched interests. During and after each antitrust cycle, the U.S. economy experienced higher GDP growth along with higher inflation. By contrast, the end of protectionist cycles is marked by major shifts in the global political-economic order and uneven growth.
Perhaps this protectionist and antitrust activity is the start of a new concurrent trend or perhaps one of these forces is an anomaly with longevity. In any case, that they’re happening at the same time adds to the complexity and uncertainty of the economic environment and those responsible for charting corporate strategy or setting capital investment priorities should consider the implications. Should they adopt a strategic vision that prepares them for a global tectonic shift — or for a long economic boom?
Featured News
Canadian Breadmakers Settle Price-Fixing Lawsuit
Jul 25, 2024 by
CPI
EssilorLuxottica Open to Meta as Shareholder, Says CEO Francesco Milleri
Jul 25, 2024 by
CPI
California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 22, Securing Independent Contractor Status for Uber and Lyft Drivers
Jul 25, 2024 by
CPI
Paramount Global Investor Sues to Block Skydance Media Merger
Jul 25, 2024 by
CPI
Software Vendors Win Class Action Status in Antitrust Case Against CDK Global
Jul 25, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – International Trade & Antitrust
Jul 26, 2024 by
CPI
What is Wrong with the WTO Discipline on Subsidies?
Jul 26, 2024 by
CPI
The Abiding Tension Between Trade Remedy Law and Antitrust
Jul 26, 2024 by
CPI
Trade and Antitrust: An End to Isolationism
Jul 26, 2024 by
CPI
International Trade Law and Domestic Regulation of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Divergent Approaches?
Jul 26, 2024 by
CPI