Price-Fixing, Fraud and Collusion, CT Attorney General Offers Sobering View of Generic Drug Market
By Colin Poitras, Yale School of Public Health
Connecticut Attorney General William Tong gave faculty and students a rare glimpse into the highly profitable prescription drug market when he shared his findings of a multi-year investigation into the generic drug industry during a presentation at the Yale School of Public Health.
As part of a Dean’s Lecture and the Yale School of Medicine’s Health and Policy Management Seminar on November 1, Tong described an elaborate network of alleged price-fixing and market share collusion between some of the nation’s leading generic drug manufactures. The allegations form the basis of two national antitrust lawsuits filed by his office and supported by a coalition of attorneys general in 49 states.
Connecticut began investigating generic drug pricing in 2014 after prices soared for common generic medications, in some cases by as much as 1,000 percent. Investigators gathered almost 19 million internal documents from major generic drug companies in response to multiple subpoenas, including detailed phone records, emails and text messages.
The contents were shocking, Tong said. Calls between executives of different generic drug companies appeared to spike on days drug prices were raised or in the days leading up to a major price increase. Even more remarkably, Tong said, investigators found a detailed spreadsheet created by one employee that appeared to contain information related to price-fixing and dividing up market shares. It was the proverbial smoking gun.
“What we uncovered was a multi-billion-dollar fraud and multi-year conspiracy to fix prices and allocate market share for hundreds of generic drugs that we depend on to live every day,” Tong said. “What we discovered is that the generic drug industry, without exaggeration, is the largest corporate cartel in history.”
“And we use that language very purposefully,” Tong continued, speaking to a packed crowd in Winslow auditorium. “(These pharmaceutical companies) run a cartel like OPEC does, like the major illicit drug cartels do. They meet. They talk. They divide up their customers. They set prices. And all of that is extraordinary illegal.”
Featured News
CVS Health Explores Potential Breakup Amid Investor Pressure: Report
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
DirecTV Acquires Dish TV, Creating 20 Million-Subscriber Powerhouse
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Kakao Mobility $54.8 Million for Anti-Competitive Practices
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Google Offers Settlement in India’s Antitrust Case Regarding Smart TVs
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh