A PYMNTS Company

US: Jackson Hewitt asks judge to dismiss no-poach suit

By  |  May 30, 2019

Jackson Hewitt has asked a federal judge in New Jersey to dismiss claims that agreements between the company and its franchisees not to poach each other’s workers violated federal antitrust law, saying brand parents and franchisees are “legally incapable” of an anticompetitive conspiracy.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The tax preparation company claimed that unlike competing businesses, franchisors and franchisees share economic interests and agreements between them do not have the anticompetitive effects prohibited by the Sherman Antitrust Act, in a motion filed on Tuesday, May 28.

    Full Content: Reuters

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.