Mexico’s Federal Commission of Economic Competition (COFECE) and the Bank of Mexico have put forward constitutional appeals against the Federal Law of Remuneration for Public Servants presented by the incoming government of Andrés Manuel López Obrador, seeking to reverse the reductions in personnel and resources imposed by the austerity policy being pushed by the new administration.
COFECE argues that the requested budget was approved with savings of $34 million pesos (US$1.6 million) in relation to 2018 and claims that the controversy arose because of uncertainty regarding how the remunerations for public servants should be regulated, as it is classified as an autonomous constitutional body. The Mexican Constitution establishes that skilled or specialized technical work—such as that carried out by the Commission—may have a wage surplus no greater than 50% above that of the President. However, the Budget for 2019 has set the President’s salary as the maximum limit for salaries and remuneration for public servants.
The antitrust regulator explained that the law creates uncertainty and should be corrected in terms of information on the parameters and items that should be taken into account to define the appropriate level of presidential income, so that it this is not a political or discretionary decision.
The case unleashed by these controversies will be one of the first challenges for the incoming president of the Supreme Court of Justice (SCJN), Arturo Zaldivar, who will have to resolve the spat over salaries of qualified officials, as well as issues related to the autonomy and competencies of independent bodies.
Full Content: Dinero En Imagen & El Siglo de Durango
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand