US District Judge Curtis Joyner has rejected Johnson & Johnson’s (J&J) bid to dismiss class action lawsuits by retailers and insurers claiming the drugmaker conducted an anticompetitive scheme to shield its blockbuster rheumatoid arthritis drug Remicade from competition.
The judge ruled the lawsuits sufficiently alleged J&J entered into contracts with insurers that required them to deny or restrict coverage for competing, cheaper drugs and threatened to deny them rebates if they reimbursed patients’ claims for them.
Remicade generated US sales of US$4.8 billion for J&J in 2016, but it faces increased competition from cheaper “biosimilar” copycats, including Pfizer’s version, which is sold in the US under the name Inflectra.
Full Content: Reuters
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Malaysia Grants Licenses to WeChat and TikTok Under New Social Media Law
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Axinn Announces Promotions of Antitrust Experts
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Federal Competition Office to Scrutinize High Electricity Prices in Germany
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Mexican Lawmakers Advance Controversial Plan to Dissolve Independent Oversight Bodies
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Motorola Accuses UK of Antitrust Breach Over Terminated Emergency Services Contract
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand