The US Justice Department (DOJ) is investigating whether Bitcoin’s record-breaking performance last year was caused by market manipulation.
Late last year, the value of a single Bitcoin hit US$9,143, climbing nearly six points in just 24 hours for a market cap north of US$152 billion.
According to a recent report from Bloomberg, the DOJ is looking into whether traders used Tether, a controversial cryptocurrency that is allegedly backed 1:1 by the US dollar, to help Bitcoin reach its record highs.
Federal prosecutors started a criminal probe into the cryptocurrencies earlier this year and now suspect that crypto exchange Bitfinex might have used Tether to illegally coordinate Bitcoin’s prices. In fact, Bitfinex has the same management team as Tether—and when new coins are released, they’re mostly launched on the exchange.
Sources told Bloomberg that the DOJ is investigating how Tether creates new coins and why they enter the market predominantly through Bitfinex.
The probe was sparked by a study published in June by University of Texas finance professor John Griffin and graduate student Amin Shams. They said at least half of the boost in Bitcoin was due to price manipulation, explaining that Tether was used to buy Bitcoin when it was declining, which helped “stabilize and manipulate” the cryptocurrency’s price.
Even when it was flying high, Bitcoin had its share of detractors. Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein said that “maybe bitcoin is a kind of a bubble,” adding, “I don’t like it. I’m not comfortable with it. I’m kind of an old dog to be absorbing that kind of a new trick.”
And JPMorgan’s chief executive, Jamie Dimon, called the cryptocurrency “a fraud.” “The currency isn’t going to work,” the executive said. “You can’t have a business where people can invent a currency out of thin air and think that people who are buying it are really smart.”
In addition, governments around the globe—including Russia, China, the UK, and the US—have issued warnings about the risks associated with cryptocurrencies.
Featured News
CVS Health Explores Potential Breakup Amid Investor Pressure: Report
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
DirecTV Acquires Dish TV, Creating 20 Million-Subscriber Powerhouse
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Kakao Mobility $54.8 Million for Anti-Competitive Practices
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Google Offers Settlement in India’s Antitrust Case Regarding Smart TVs
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh