Visa, American Express, and Mastercard are among the payment companies that are the subject of an inquiry by Brazilian regulators.
According to a report in Bloomberg citing the Brazilian Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE), the Brazilian regulators are looking to see if the credit card companies ran afoul of payment network rules. Bloomberg noted that Visa stated in an annual regulatory filing that it’s also looking into the country’s Elo Network as well. Bloomberg stated said the issue has to do with a network rule that requires a merchant’s bank to get certain information from payment facilitators. Bloomberg reported that Visa stated it was cooperating with the Brazilian regulators that launched the inquiry in October. A Mastercard spokesman told Bloomberg the payment company didn’t have an immediate comment, noted the report. American Express stated it wasn’t contacted by CADE about the inquiry, but will cooperate with regulators.
The Brazilian digital payments market has exploded over the past few years, with more than thirty payment processors vying for customers business. StoneCo and PagSeguro, two of the payment processors that were among the more than thirty to attend a meeting with Brazil’s central bank, went public in the US earlier in 2018.
Late last month Visa made a strategic minority investment in Conductor, a digital payments processing technology platform in Brazil. In a press release, Visa stated the investment will go to help Conductor expand its products and to accelerate innovation in payments. The investment reinforces an existing partnership between the two, Visa noted in the press release. Conductor, which has been backed by Riverwood Capital since 2014, is a key technology processing platform for retailers, banks and other companies in Brazil, according to the press release. Visa stated its investment in Conductor is part of the payment company’s global strategy to open up the Visa ecosystem and support a broad array of new partners.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand