Manuel Suárez Fragoso, Magistrate at the Third Civil Unitary Court of Mexico, announced a setback for mobile phone giant Telcel, a subsidiary of América Móvil, by declaring valid a lawsuit filed in 2012 against the company, for which it would face a fine of $12 billion Mexican pesos (approximately US$640 million.) The fine had been canceled at the time, after the company agreed to reduce the amounts charged to competitors for interconnection services.
However, the court resumed the case on the basis of a new lawsuit presented by Total Play in 2014, determining that reparations for damages caused by monopolistic practices had not been made. The court based its claim on the Federal Law of Economic Competition, which allows companies to denounce damages against them through civil proceedings.
Suárez Fragoso resolved that the amount to be paid as damages shall be the difference between the cost unilaterally established by the defendant, derived from its substantial power in the market, and the amounts paid by the plaintiffs for the interconnection service, for the termination of calls from June 29, 2006, to April 30, 2012. The final amount shall be determined by the Fourth District Court.
Telcel can still challenge the magistrate’s ruling, although at the moment it has not issued statements in this regard.
Full Content: El Economista
Featured News
European Commission Appoints New Chief Competition Economist
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
EU Commission Requests Information from YouTube, Snapchat, TikTok on Algorithm Usage
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
Michael Jordan’s NASCAR Team Files Antitrust Suit Against Series, Claiming Unfair Practices
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
Novelist Sues Meta Over AI Use of Books
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
Judge Allows FTC Antitrust Case Against Amazon to Move Forward
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh