The government of Ecuador will seek to save up to US$400 million through corrections to its public purchasing processes, which include restrictions on contracting through special regimes and amendments to the law.
The National Public Procurement Service (Sercop) carried out a study with the World Bank and the conclusion was that there were widespread abuses when using the so-called special regime figure, as it was not used exclusively to attend to exceptional cases.
“When analyzing the prices of contracts under the special regime versus those hired by the common system, if they had entered competition, the study shows a possible savings of up to US$1,400 million dollars, since the prices obtained under the special regime were sometimes twice as expensive, on average,” said Silvana Vallejo, director of the Public Procurement Service.
“We have specific cases that we have detected. They were contracts for suppliers that did not meet requirements. That shows that this obviously lends itself to corruption. Not all cases are like that, some could have gone through their processes responsibly” she concluded.
Full Content: El Telegrafo
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand