In this brief note we explore some of the potential for modern “machine learning” methods to aid in the detection, and therefore defense, of collusive arrangements. We argue that where and when the problem can be formed as one of classification or prediction – are the observed prices during this period well-explained by an algorithm which does explain prices in another period? – machine learning algorithms may be useful supplementary tools. But we also argue that the analysis of collusion rarely ends with such questions. When we need to test a hypothesis, the statistical properties of more traditional econometric methods are likely still required.
Featured News
FIFA Faces Antitrust Lawsuit in US Federal Court Over Puerto Rico Soccer Dispute
Nov 26, 2024 by
CPI
US Judge Orders No Delay in Google Antitrust Trial Despite Potential Shift in Administration
Nov 26, 2024 by
CPI
Google Revamps Search Results in Europe Amid EU Scrutiny
Nov 26, 2024 by
CPI
Tech Giants Urge Australian Government to Delay Controversial Social Media Bill
Nov 26, 2024 by
CPI
EU’s Margrethe Vestager Urges Regulators to Be ‘Bolder’ as She Steps Down
Nov 26, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI