By Marshall Steinbaum
Labor platforms like Uber have mostly escaped antitrust scrutiny, despite the apparent legal risk that, by coordinating pricing among tens of thousands of “independent contractors,” they might run afoul of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. On the other hand, the enforcement agencies have indicated that collective bargaining by those contractors against the platform does trigger liability under Section 1. This piece argues that this disparate antitrust treatment of powerful platforms versus their counterparties plays a significant role in carving out legal space for the labor platforms, in the regulatory black hole that has opened up as both labor and antitrust law have retracted.
Featured News
FIFA Faces Antitrust Lawsuit in US Federal Court Over Puerto Rico Soccer Dispute
Nov 26, 2024 by
CPI
US Judge Orders No Delay in Google Antitrust Trial Despite Potential Shift in Administration
Nov 26, 2024 by
CPI
Google Revamps Search Results in Europe Amid EU Scrutiny
Nov 26, 2024 by
CPI
Tech Giants Urge Australian Government to Delay Controversial Social Media Bill
Nov 26, 2024 by
CPI
EU’s Margrethe Vestager Urges Regulators to Be ‘Bolder’ as She Steps Down
Nov 26, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI