Eight years after Live Nation joined forces with TicketMaster to create a single entity known for its exorbitant service fees, The New York Times reports the concert promoter is being investigated for its ruthless business practices.
The Department Of Justice (DOJ) is looking into complaints that Live Nation, which manages some 500 artists, “used its control over concert tours to pressure venues into contracting with its subsidiary, Ticketmaster.” Live Nation’s biggest competitor, AEG, claims that for shows that were originally booked at its venues in Atlanta, Las Vegas, Minneapolis, and more, the company was pressured to use TicketMaster as a vendor. The claims indicate a “possible violation of antitrust law,” according to The Times.
In one case, the booking director of Atlanta’s Gwinnett Center reached out to Live Nation after a Matchbox 20 show fell through in 2013. The venue had recently switched from TicketMaster to an AEG-controlled ticketing service. “Don’t abandon Gwinnett,” the director, Dan Markham, wrote in an email to an unnamed Live Nation talent coordinator. “If there’s an issue or issues let’s address.” The response was terse but suggestive: “Issue? Three letters. Can you guess what they are?”
Emails aside, Live Nation insisted that “the decision to bypass the center was not punitive. The other venue was managed by Live Nation and simply fit more people.” But in 2014, the number of Live Nation tours that hit the Gwinnett was down from four to two. Live Nation says this shift is “routine,” but Markham feels the company was essentially “[warning] us that they would put us in a literal boycott.” AEG provided the DOJ with the aforementioned emails, which is why Live Nation’s antitrust lawyer now says “You have a disgruntled competitor that is trying to explain their loss around the boogeyman that there were threats made that nobody can document.” AEG provided the DOJ with the aforementioned emails, which is why Live Nation’s antitrust lawyer now says “You have a disgruntled competitor that is trying to explain their loss around the boogeyman that there were threats made that nobody can document.”
AEG has also come under fire for possible antitrust violations; musician Ozzy Osbourne filed suit last month against the company for allegedly trying to prevent him from playing a show at its O2 arena in London if he didn’t also book one at the Staples Center (which AEG also owns).
Full Content: New York Times
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand