In the most recent in a series of settlements, Japanese company Nishikawa Rubber Co. will pay US$11.9 million to settle price fixing and bid rigging claims brought by a class of auto dealer plaintiffs.
The settlement agreement received preliminary approval from Judge Marianne O. Battani of the US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan on December 13.
According to the December 13 memorandum in support of the settlement agreement, the settlement is part of a Justice Department (DOJ) investigation into alleged price fixing, market allocation and bid rigging in the automotive parts market that began in February 2010.
The DOJ alleged that Nishikawa participated in a price fixing and bid rigging conspiracy in weatherstripping and other automotive body sealing products from approximately 2000 until at least September 2012.
Nishikawa sold these sealing products to Honda, Toyota and Subaru, according to the DOJ. In August 2016, Nishikawa pleaded guilty to conspiracy and agreed to pay a US$130 million fine.
According to the more recent settlement, the class of auto dealers directly or indirectly purchased the rigged-price Nishikawa products.
Full Content: The European Rubber Journal
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Malaysia Grants Licenses to WeChat and TikTok Under New Social Media Law
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Axinn Announces Promotions of Antitrust Experts
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Federal Competition Office to Scrutinize High Electricity Prices in Germany
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Mexican Lawmakers Advance Controversial Plan to Dissolve Independent Oversight Bodies
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Motorola Accuses UK of Antitrust Breach Over Terminated Emergency Services Contract
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand