AT&T has officially fired back at the US Justice Department’s (DOJ) lawsuit to block the US$85 billion Time Warner merger and has begun pushing for a trial start date in February 2018.
In AT&T’s lengthy response to the DOJ’s complaint, the company said that the Time Warner deal will be a “pro-competitive, pro-consumer response to an intensely competitive and rapidly changing video marketplace.”
That remark was made in response to claims from the DOJ that AT&T will use its control of Time Warner’s programming to jack up prices for its rival pay TV providers.
“Simply put, no competitor will be eliminated by this merger,” the company said in the filing. Because AT&T claims it is not seeking to buy a company with which it directly competes, the company said, the government “cannot meet its burden of proof” for an antitrust argument.” and/or ““In seeking to block this merger, then, the Government is not only departing from established antitrust precedent, but is also shielding rivals from new competition that would greatly benefit consumers.”
As a remedy to that potential problem, AT&T has offered to submit to baseball-style arbitration with distributors if the deal is approved. That means that, for at least seven years, distributors of Time Warner content including TBS, TNT, CNN and HBO could enter arbitration if the parties can’t agree on terms for wholesale rates. In that event, Turner channels would remain on the distributor while the process plays out.
Full Content: Washington Post
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand