Bogota’s High Court, represented by two judges and one magistrate, has denied the Attorney General access to evidence of possible irregularities in the award of the third contract to build the lane of the Bogota-Girardot highway, delaying the criminal investigation that the Office of the Prosecutor seeks to file against those involved.
The prosecutors have asked on three occasions to be allowed to probate evidence obtained during the Superintendency of Industry and Commerce’s (SIC) investigation on the subject, which includes emails, cell phone calls and economic evidence that would compromise up to three companies, including two from abroad.
The SIC announced in February that it would open a process for possible restrictive practices to free competition in the tender of the work, awarded in August 2016. “These suspicions led the SIC to collect evidence 20 days after the award. They found intact information, with the authorization of the people involved,” says the prosecution.
However, in the opinion of the judges, the evidence requested is confidential and personal data belonging to executives of the companies involved. In addition, they say, the prosecution has other “less invasive” means to obtain the evidence. Among the material collected by the SIC there is information from the Consorcio Plural Vias a Girardot, made up of Concreto Industrial and Constructora Conconcreto, which ultimately secured the contract.
Full Content: El Tiempo
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand