The European Commission issued Facebook with a €110 million ($122 million) fine for “misleading” European regulators over its controversial acquisition of WhatsApp in 2014, the EU institution revealed in a release published on Thursday.
The Commission found that the Menlo Park-based social media giant violated the EU Merger Regulation according to which companies are mandated to provide accurate information to investigators in merger probes, adding that the fine issued to the company is meant to serve as a “deterrent” and is proportionate to the significance of Facebook’s transgression.
While the Commission didn’t assert that Facebook was actively trying to influence the outcome of its 2014 consolidation investigation by withholding information, the company still violated existing regulations by not fully disclosing all of the implications of its WhatsApp acquisition.
The European antitrust watchdog took issue with the fact that Facebook’s representatives initially didn’t reveal that the company would be able to match Facebook user profiles with WhatsApp accounts, which regulators believe was one of the main motivations behind the social media giant’s decision to purchase the popular instant messaging (IM) service.
The firm’s ability to do so came to light following its Terms of Service change in August 2016 that caused a significant backlash from the general public and the top competition regulator on the Old Continent. Following that turn of events, the Commission concluded that Facebook provided it with incomplete and thus misleading information on its WhatsApp acquisition, which prompted a new investigation of the deal that has now been officially concluded with the announcement of the latest Commission-issued antitrust fine.
Full Content: New York Times
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand