Posted by Social Science Research Network
Data-Opolies
By Maurice E. Stucke (University of Tennessee) & Allen P. Grunes (The Konkurrenz Group)
Abstract: In contrast to the European Commission, the US Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission have not meaningfully prosecuted monopolistic abuses over the past 16 years. The US Supreme Court’s view on monopolies has also become forgiving. There is no empirical support that monopolies—whether in dynamic or static markets—are generally good for society.
Yes, one might say. But with the expansion of the data-driven economy, one has less to fear of monopolization. We debunk these myths in our book, Big Data and Competition Policy (Oxford University Press 2016). Our aim here is to summarize several reasons why data-driven markets can be monopolized, and identify one recent example of a data-driven exclusionary tactic. Thus, prosecuting monopolistic abuses is even more important in certain online industries.
Featured News
NFL Antitrust Verdict Amounts to $4.7 Billion in ‘Sunday Ticket’ Case
Jul 4, 2024 by
CPI
German Competition Regulator Fines AVM EUR 16 Million for Price-Fixing Scheme
Jul 4, 2024 by
CPI
UK’s CMA Director Returns to Cleary Gottlieb as Antitrust Partner
Jul 4, 2024 by
CPI
Canada’s Competition Bureau to Expedite Guidance on Anti-Greenwashing Rules
Jul 4, 2024 by
CPI
Top Lawyers Face Off in Tempur Sealy’s Bid for Mattress Firm
Jul 4, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Private Equity Roll-Up Schemes
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI
The FTC’s Focus on Private Equity is Warranted
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI
Unraveling the Roll-Up: Private Equity’s Misunderstood Investment Strategy
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Focus on Private Equity Funds and Serial Acquisitions
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI
Private Equity Roll-Ups Amidst Heightened Antitrust Enforcement
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI