Anthem vowed Thursday to appeal a federal judge’s move to halt its planned takeover of Cigna.
A federal judge in DC made the decision Wednesday, saying it would violate antitrust law for the second- and third-largest health insurers in the US to combine.
The deal, valued at $54 billion when it was announced in 2015, would make the combined company the largest health care provider in the nation.
But if the merger plans fall through, Anthem will owe Cigna a $1.85 billion breakup fee, according to the terms of their agreement.
Anthem is determined to ensure Wednesday’s decision isn’t the final word on the issue. The company said in a statement Thursday that it “promptly intends to file a notice of appeal and request an expedited hearing.”
Anthem added that the deal “was approved by over 99% of the votes cast by the shareholders of both companies.”
Cigna said in a statement posted early Thursday that it “intends to carefully review the opinion and evaluate its options.”
Anthem has argued that the deal would save health insurance customers over $2 billion in medical costs because Cigna customers will be able to access discounts that Anthem is able to offer its customers.
In the order issued Wednesday, Washington DC District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson wrote that Cigna may not be able to offer steeper discounts, but it seeks to keep its customers healthier.
“Cigna has sought to differentiate itself with its approach towards reducing costs by increasing health,” the judge wrote. “For this reason, some customers prefer Cigna notwithstanding its discount disadvantage, and there was some testimony from medical personnel that the approach is working.”
Full Content: Gazette
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand