GM’s Chinese joint venture with SAIC is being investigated by the Chinese government for possible antitrust violations, Bloomberg said Wednesday, citing people familiar with the matter. The probe is reportedly being conducted by China’s powerful National Development and Reform Commission. Some dealerships in the SAIC-GM network have been investigated over retail pricing practices, sources told Bloomberg.
This would not be the first time that GM’s China arm has appeared in the NDRC’s cross hairs. In 2014, GM China had to answer to government regulators investigating retail pricing for cars and especially for parts. Original parts can be an extremely lucrative business for automakers, more so when they can dictate to their dealers where to buy them. Back then, GM was not alone on the Chinese government’s radar. Audi agreed to pay $40 million for alleged violations. Volkswagen and Chrysler were fined a combined $46 million. Daimler‘s Mercedes-Benz had its offices raided; Toyota and other Japanese companies faced investigations. In the wake of these investigations, foreign automakers relaxed their grip on parts pricing in China.
The surprising report of an investigation of GM comes suspiciously close to President-elect Trump’s incendiary recent comments on Taiwan. Trump said that the US could change its long-standing position that Taiwan is part of “one China,” which shocked the Chinese political scene. Along with Tibet and Tiananmen, Taiwan is one of the most sensitive issues in China, commonly referred to as the “three Ts.”
Full Content: Forbes
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
CVS Health Explores Potential Breakup Amid Investor Pressure: Report
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
DirecTV Acquires Dish TV, Creating 20 Million-Subscriber Powerhouse
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Kakao Mobility $54.8 Million for Anti-Competitive Practices
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Google Offers Settlement in India’s Antitrust Case Regarding Smart TVs
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh