Just a few months back during March 2016, the gaming giant, Valve Corporation, was found out to be guilty as per laws dictated by the Australian Federal Court of breaching the Australian consumer law because of its long-running severe lack of a refund policy.
Charges had been filed against Counter-strike and Left 4 Dead developer by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission all the way back in 2014, these charges included the claim that the company has misled Australian consumers in its rather ambiguous Steam Subscriber Agreement and the two versions of its lengthy Steam Refund Policy.
Australian customers of Valve’s products have a legal right to asking for a refund in the case that they have been sold a faulty or damaged product, and for as long as they’ve been present in Australia, Valve has not honored this right as per court’s standards.
Valve’s main defence was focused around the fact that it hasn’t officially operated its business in Australia instead it conducts all of its business over in Seattle and simply put that it doesn’t restrict Australians’ any access to the service. However, in a sad turn of events for Valve, the court did not agree.
Full Content: The Tech Portal
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand