Competition Buzz: The Role of Remedies Imposed by Competition Authorities in Merger Procedures: An Applied Analysis to the Retail Sector
By: Francisco Agüero
This paper summarizes the relevant literature in merger remedies imposed by competition authorities, focusing mainly in Chile’s Competion Court’s decisions during the last five years. Thus, the paper comments and analysis behavioral and structural remedies (i.e.divestitures) established after merger procedures. A special attention is put into the purpose of the remedies and their proportionality.
Full Content: SSRN
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletterr for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Japan’s Nippon Steel Eyes Year-End Close on $15B US Steel Deal Amid Political Uncertainty
Nov 7, 2024 by
CPI
Canada Orders Dissolution of TikTok’s Business Amid National Security Concerns
Nov 7, 2024 by
CPI
India Raids Amazon, Flipkart Seller Offices in Foreign Investment Probe
Nov 7, 2024 by
CPI
Canada’s Competition Bureau Seeks Public Feedback on Updated Merger Guidelines
Nov 7, 2024 by
CPI
FTC Adopts Stricter Reporting Rules for Mergers, Delays Expected in 2025
Nov 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI