A federal judge has agreed to hear one of the insurance mega-merger cases but has handed off the other.
Bloomberg reports that US District Judge John Bates, in Washington, DC, said Friday that he would hear Humana Inc. and Aetna Inc.’s case in court. The companies are fighting antitrust regulators, who filed a lawsuit to block Aetna’s proposed $37 billion purchase of Louisville-based Humana.
Bates handed off a similar case involing two other big insurers, Cigna. and Anthem Inc., to another judge, who has yet to be assigned.
The US Department of Justice sued to block the two deals at the same time. The DOJ wanted the cases to be heard together, but the buying companies have asked for them to be heard separately.
Both Aetna and Anthem also asked for the cases to be heard in the fall, though the DOJ said it wouldn’t be ready until February. Aetna wanted its case to go first, in hopes of getting the matter decided of ahead of its Dec. 31 deadline to close the $37 billion deal, which was announced last year.
Bloomberg reports that this deadline is the reason that Bates decided to separate the cases and hear Humana and Aetna’s case first.
“Given the complexity and importance of these cases, the court cannot feasibly try and decide both in that time frame,” Bates wrote in a ruling cited by the publication. “Ultimately, it will be fairer to the parties and better for the public if one of the cases is randomly reassigned to another judge in this district, who can give it prompt and full attention while this judge does the same with the other.”
Full Content: Health Care Dive
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand