According to Reuters, Mofcom, China’s commerce ministry, may very well stand in the way of Uber’s Chinese unit and Didi Chuxing’s business combination; as of August 2, the governmental agency has not approved the merger.
Didi Chuxing said that it does not require regulatory approval given the lack of profit among the two companies. In a statement, Didi Chuxing pointed out that the company did not meet an approximately $60 million trigger requirement for an anti-trust process.
Alternatively, the combination of Uber’s China operation with Didi Chuxing’s business will result in a $35 billion ride-hailing behemoth and will raise monopoly concerns.
Didi Chuxing has previously claimed that it holds 87 percent of the market in its home country and Uber China ranks as the second largest company in the space.
“Mofcom has not currently received a merger filing related to the deal between Didi and Uber,” Reuters quoted a ministry spokesman, Shen Danyang, as saying. “All transactors must apply to the ministry in advance. Those that haven’t applied won’t be able to carry out a merger.”
Full Content: Benzinga
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand