The Internet of Platforms and Walled Gardens: Implications for Openness and Neutrality
Posted by Social Science Research Network
The Internet of Platforms and Walled Gardens: Implications for Openness and Neutrality
Rob Frieden (Pennsylvania State University)
Abstract: This paper will examine developments in the Internet marketplace that limit and condition access in light of growing incentives to offer prioritized interconnection at a premium price. Commercially-driven interconnection and compensation arrangements support biased networks rather than open ones. Single ventures, such as Amazon, Facebook, Google and Netflix have exploited, “winner take all” networking externalities resulting in the creation of dominant platforms and walled gardens. Advocates for network neutrality claim that limited and “pay to play” access will threaten a competitive marketplace of ideas by imposing higher costs on unaffiliated, disfavored and cash-poor content providers. Opponents argue that Internet Service Providers (“ISPs”) should have the flexibility to customize services and accrue marketplace rewards for superior products and services.
The paper identifies four types of government responses to price and quality of service discrimination that can exploit, or remedy choke points within the Internet ecosystem where large volumes of traffic have to traverse a single ISP network, or service provider platform. Governments can refrain from regulating access and accept aspects of market concentration as proper rewards to ventures offering desirable content and carriage services. Alternatively, they can impose access neutrality requirements to offset market-driven concentration and dominance. Between these poles, governments can apply antitrust/competition policy remedies, or rely on expert regulatory agencies to respond to complaints.
Featured News
EU Industry Chief Warns Elon Musk to Comply with EU Law Ahead of Trump Interview on X
Aug 12, 2024 by
CPI
US Judge Dismisses Antitrust Suit Against Google, but Consumers May Get Another Chance
Aug 12, 2024 by
CPI
Objections Raised Against Landmark $2.7 Billion NCAA Settlement
Aug 12, 2024 by
CPI
Orrick Strengthens Antitrust and Competition Practice with New Partner Hire in London
Aug 12, 2024 by
CPI
Austrian Group NOYB Files GDPR Complaint Against X Over AI Data Use
Aug 12, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Editorial Board Antipasto
Aug 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Enforcement in Labor Markets – A Little Less Conversation and a Little More Action
Aug 8, 2024 by
James Killick, Peter Citron & Nina Frie
The Talent Trap: Acqui-Hires and Non-Competes from an Antitrust Perspective
Aug 8, 2024 by
Kah Tham & Stephen Kinsella
Information Exchange – Pitfalls from Recent Case Law and Enforcement Practice, and How to Avoid Them
Aug 8, 2024 by
Kyriakos Fountoukakos, Nicoleta Sendrea & Riku Ode
The American Express Decision and its Critics
Aug 8, 2024 by
David Evans & Richard Schmalensee