A federal judge denied summary judgment to Toshiba in a case accusing the company and other Japanese and Korean companies of conspiring to fix prices of rechargeable lithium batteries.
The multidistrict lawsuit, transferred to San Francisco in 2013, accuses Samsung, Panasonic, Sanyo, Sony and other major electronics companies of violating federal antitrust law.
In a 7-page order, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers rejected Toshiba’s argument that the claims against it are time-barred.
Toshiba said that it withdrew from any alleged conspiracy by the end of 2004 through the sale of its lithium ion cell manufacturing business.
But Rogers said that there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the company actually did so, since Toshiba “potentially remained a member of and participated in a battery trade association alongside alleged conspirators.”
She also said that Toshiba “held onto and selectively licensed ‘valuable IP’ relating to lithium ion battery technology” and “discarded certain manufacturing equipment that might have been sold to non-conspirators.”
And “notably, Toshiba admittedly stored cells it had produced prior to selling the manufacturing business, aggregated those cells into battery packs and sold the lithium ion battery packs through at least 2007 – earning nearly $1 million in revenue,” Rogers said.
Full Content: Courthouse News Service
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand