Yong Huang and Xin Zhang, March 20, 2016
On March 20, 2013, the Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province gave its judgment on the case of abuse of market dominance of Beijing Qihoo Technology Co., Ltd. (“Qihoo”) vs. Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd. (collectively referred to as “Tencent”) and dismissed all the plaintiff’s claims. On October 8, 2014, the Supreme People’s Court made a second trial on the case and held that in the first instance judgment the facts ascertained were basically true, the application of law was correct and the trial result was appropriate, thereby it judged to reject the appeal and maintained the original verdict.
Featured News
Ex–New Jersey Attorney General Launches Litigation-Focused Law Firm
Feb 15, 2026 by
CPI
China Issues New Anti-Monopoly Rules Targeting Online Platform Practices
Feb 15, 2026 by
CPI
SEC Chair Says Agency May Get Involved in Regulating Prediction Markets
Feb 15, 2026 by
CPI
Pentagon’s AI Push Faces Friction With Anthropic Over Usage Restrictions
Feb 15, 2026 by
CPI
California Adopts Broad Premerger Notification Law, Expanding State Antitrust Oversight
Feb 15, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Hub-&-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
CPI
A Data Analytics Company as the Hub in a Hub-and-Spoke Cartel
Jan 26, 2026 by
Joseph Harrington
Hub and Spoke Cartels
Jan 26, 2026 by
Patrick Van Cayseele
Hub-and-Spoke Collusion or Vertical Exclusion? Identifying the Rim in Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz, Pedro Gonzaga, Laura Ildefonso & Albert Metz
The Algorithmic Middleman in a Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracy: Divergent Court Decisions and the Expanding Patchwork of State and Local Regulations
Jan 26, 2026 by
Bradley C. Weber