Chile’s Free Competition Defense Tribunal (TDLC) has decided to reject the requests for a delay in investigations requested by supermarket chains Cencosud and SMU, as they seek more time to comply with the investigating agency’s information requests regarding their involvement in a price-fixing deal.
The Tribunal pointed out that the arguments presented by the National Economic Prosecutors, the main competition investigating authority, had been “sufficiently clear” and free of contradictions, as had been claimed by SMU’s request.
The TDLC further clarified that the investigations into the case cover a period between 2008 and 2011, “meaning this Tribunal will only be able to sanction any anticompetitive conducts detected to have taken place” during this period, as said by the regulator’s Presiding Minister, Judge Tomás Menchaca.
Full content: Capital > http://www.capital.cl/poder/2016/03/11/090312-tdlc-rechaza-dilatorias-solicitadas-por-cencosud-y-smu
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Australia Passes Strict Social Media Ban for Under-16s
Nov 28, 2024 by
CPI
Google Appeals Ruling Overhaul of Play Store in Epic Games Lawsuit
Nov 28, 2024 by
CPI
FTC Investigates Uber for Alleged Subscription Violations
Nov 28, 2024 by
CPI
India’s Watchdog Launches Investigation Into Google’s Real-Money Gaming Policies
Nov 28, 2024 by
CPI
Microsoft Under FTC Scrutiny for Cloud, AI, and Licensing Practices
Nov 28, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI