The man who is leading an inquiry into the UK bank accounts market has been accused of ‘laziness’ by a group of MPs.
Alasdair Smith – from the Competition and Markets Authority – came under fire from MPs on the Treasury Select Committee.
Last month the CMA produced its initial report on the current account market. Mr Smith was repeatedly pressed to say how much consumers actually pay for supposedly free bank accounts.But while Mr Smith knew how much his own account cost, he said he was not able to give MPs any figures for other consumers.
Committee member Mark Garnier was highly critical. “The answers you are coming up with appear to be lazy,” he said. “You haven’t challenged the banks to come up with the costs. You have had the wool pulled over your eyes.”
Mr Smith said said the CMA – which is due to make a final report next summer – would consider “all possible routes”.
Nevertheless he was repeatedly pressed by the committee’s chairman, Andrew Tyrie, to provide a “bottom-line number” that would allow consumers to compare the costs of different accounts.
Further criticism came from a letter from the boss of Tesco Bank, which was read out to the committee. “This report (from the CMA) has only begun to scratch the surface,” wrote Benny Higgins, the chief executive of Tesco Bank.
“We must increase the transparency around the true costs customers incur when using their current accounts,” he wrote.
The CMA report concluded that so-called “free-if-in-credit” accounts should be allowed to continue.
Full content: Bloomberg
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
CVS Health Explores Potential Breakup Amid Investor Pressure: Report
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
DirecTV Acquires Dish TV, Creating 20 Million-Subscriber Powerhouse
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Kakao Mobility $54.8 Million for Anti-Competitive Practices
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Google Offers Settlement in India’s Antitrust Case Regarding Smart TVs
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh