Gazprom proposed options for an antitrust settlement with the European Union’s regulator while refusing to admit any guilt, an executive at Russia’s monopoly natural gas exporter said.
“We didn’t plead guilty on any of the items,” Gazprom Deputy Chief Executive Officer Alexander Medvedev said in an interview on Tuesday in Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk in Russia’s Far East. Gazprom proposed settlement options “that can eliminate their anxiety – without an admission of guilt.”
The state-controlled company on Monday filed its reply to accusations that it wielded market power to impose unfair prices in central and eastern Europe, arguing that the allegations “are based on an incorrect methodology.”
Settlement talks froze last year as political tensions escalated over Russia’s involvement in the Ukrainian crisis. While the conflict has pushed Gazprom to seek new customers, the EU, which gets about one-third of its gas from Russia, remains its biggest market.
“We would very much like these issues not to be politicised,” Medvedev said and declined to comment on a time frame for a possible deal. “The truth will triumph.’
Full content: The Financial Times
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand